Understanding Pain and Suffering in Litigation Cases

Pain and suffering are critical elements in many personal injury lawsuits. These terms reference the physical discomfort and emotional distress that a plaintiff endures as a result of an injury. While pain typically refers to physical sensations, suffering encompasses the broader range of emotional and psychological impacts. Understanding these concepts is crucial for both plaintiffs and attorneys when navigating litigation.

Defining Pain and Suffering

Pain: This involves the physical discomfort and restrictions experienced by the injured party. Pain could be acute, occurring immediately post-injury, or chronic, lasting over extended periods. Examples include back pain from a car accident or lingering migraines after a head injury.

Suffering: This term covers the emotional and psychological effects of an injury. Suffering may manifest as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or even loss of enjoyment in daily activities. It reflects a diminished quality of life that extends beyond the physical damage.

Calculating Pain and Suffering

Unlike medical bills or lost wages, quantifying pain and suffering isn’t straightforward. Typically, attorneys employ one of two methods:

Multiplier Method: The total actual damages (e.g., medical expenses, lost earnings) are multiplied by a number, usually between 1.5 and 5, depending on the severity. For instance, if actual damages are $10,000 and the multiplier is 3, the pain and suffering compensation would be $30,000.

Per Diem Method: This approach assigns a daily rate to the pain and suffering experienced. The daily rate is then multiplied by the number of days the plaintiff is reasonably expected to endure the pain or suffering.

The final award for pain and suffering is often subject to the judge’s or jury’s discretion, influenced by the compelling nature of the evidence presented.

Evidence and Documentation

Convincing a court of the extent of pain and suffering relies heavily on evidence. Relevant documentation might include:

  • Medical Records: Detailed notes from doctors can illustrate the severity and duration of pain.
  • Personal Journals: Plaintiffs may maintain journals that record daily pain levels and emotional turmoil.
  • Expert Testimony: Mental health professionals or pain management experts can provide informed opinions on the plaintiff’s condition.
  • Witness Statements: Accounts from family, friends, or colleagues can bolster claims by describing changes in the plaintiff’s behavior and lifestyle.

Challenges in Proving Pain and Suffering

Demonstrating pain and suffering poses unique challenges. Unlike physical injuries, emotional and psychological damages are not easily visible or quantifiable. Defense attorneys may argue against subjective claims, suggesting exaggeration or pre-existing conditions. Hence, plaintiffs must present credible and coherent evidence to support their assertions.

Statutory Caps

In some jurisdictions, there are statutory caps on the amount of compensation for non-economic damages, including pain and suffering. These limits aim to prevent excessively large awards that could impact insurance premiums and the overall cost of litigation. Nonetheless, they can also restrict the compensation that genuinely injured parties receive.

The Role of Insurance Companies

Insurance companies often play a significant role in disputing or negotiating pain and suffering claims. They might deploy adjusters to evaluate the situation or suggest settlements lower than the plaintiff’s claim. Attorneys usually negotiate with insurers to ensure fair compensation reflective of the true extent of pain and suffering experienced.

Conclusion

Pain and suffering are integral considerations in personal injury litigation. They not only cover the tangible physical discomfort but also the profound emotional and psychological consequences of an injury. Effective representation and thorough documentation are essential for achieving adequate compensation. Understanding the complexity of proving these damages can significantly influence the outcome of a litigation case.

 

Written by 

Compassion, Commitment, Creativity & Personal Attention Born in Winston-Salem, NC in 1965. He obtained his undergraduate degree from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in 1988 and his JD degree from Campbell University School of Law in 1991. Steve authored the chapter on ad valorem taxation in the Minister’s Legal Desk Reference. He began the practice of law in Charlotte in August 1991, with emphasis in personal injury and worker’s compensation litigation. Steve has represented many people who have been involved in accidents, whether it be car, motorcycle, truck, construction or on the job accidents, including wrongful death and catastrophic injuries. Steve Hayes is licensed to practice in North Carolina, South Carolina and all Federal Courts. He is a member of the North Carolina Bar Association, the South Carolina Bar Association, the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, the South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, the American Bar Association, the Mecklenburg Trial Lawyers Association and the Mecklenburg Medical Legal Society. He is an experienced trial lawyer. Steve is married to Jordan Denton Hayes and they have four children, Ella, Gabriel, Madelyn and Lillian. Steve is an active member of: American Bar Association North Carolina Bar Association South Carolina Bar Association Mecklenburg Medical Legal Society Mecklenburg Trial Lawyers Association Association of Trial Lawyers of America South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers Steve is licensed to practice in both North and South Carolina and all Federal Courts. Expertise Justia Contact the Charlotte NC Car Accident Lawyers Group at 980-239-2275.